Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed

Prabowo, A.; Hayati, R.N.; Minarsih, S.; Haryanto, B.; Ludfiani, D.D.; Supriyo, A.; Subiharta, S.; Nurwahyuni, E.; Hindarwati, Y.; Setiapermas, M.N.; Sudarto, S.; Samijan, S.; Utomo, B.; Winarn, E.; Suretno, N.D.; Wibawa, W.; Agustini, S.; Prasetyo, A.; Hantoro, F.R.P.; Hariyanto, W.; Aristya, V.E.

doi:10.22034/gjesm.2024.02.20

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

¹ Research Center for Sustainable Production System and Life Cycle Assessment, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

² Research Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

³ Research Center for Food Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

⁴ Research Center for Horticultural and Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

⁵ Research Center for Social Welfare, Village and Connectivity, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.02.20

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sorghum is a grain-producing commodity with the seeds being a food source, while the leaves, stems, and bran serve as animal feed. The productivity depends on the specific variety, environment, infrastructure, and technology used. Sorghum cultivation in Indonesia is carried out primarily using agroforestry or monoculture. Despite not being as popular compared to rice and corn due to the prevalence of these staples in Indonesian diets, sorghum has the potential to replace corn because its cultivation is easier and the results are more profitable. Therefore, this study aimed to determine sustainability index and potential of sorghum for food and feed by identifying dimensions and attributes that influence sustainability.
METHODS: This study was conducted at Raji, Demak, Central Java, Indonesia in 2023. Data were collected through focus group discussions and structural questionnaires consisting of 28 attributes associated with environmental, social, economic, and technological dimensions. Multidimensional scaling method and Rapfish software were used for data analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was used to ascertain sustainability level and attributes leverage, as well as check errors and variations in assessment.
FINDINGS: The results showed that sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was 79.67, categorized as very sustainable. Analysis across four dimensions showed that the social dimension had the highest (83.80) sustainability index, followed by the technological (82.28), economical (77.46), and environmental (75.15) dimensions. A total of 12 attributes were found to greatly affect sustainability. These included land availability, the efficiency of water used, the prevention of natural resource exploitation, motivation level, minimal interference with primary agricultural activities, community acceptance, productivity, sales profit level, ease of sale and cultivation, tools availability, and technological sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was categorized as very sustainable with a value of 79.67. This index consisted of the environmental (75.15), social (83.80), economical (77.46), and technological dimensions (82.28). The average productivity at the study site was 6-7 tons per hectare, with a production potency of 300-350 tons per year. Additionally, the potency of sorghum stover production was 471.8 ton per year of dry matter and could be used as feed for 163 animal units per year

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

Sustainability of sorghum as food and feed was influenced by the high value of environmental, social, economical, and technological dimensions;
Sorghum as food and feed has a good sustainability index of 79.67;
The potential of sorghum production was 300-350 tons grain/year and 48 tons dry matter stover/year;
The 12 attributes leverage were influential to sustainability of sorghum, which included environmental, social, economical, and technological dimensions;
The study novelty is obtaining sustainability index numbers, attributes that greatly impact sustainability, and the potency of sorghum as food and feed.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Sustainable agriculture management

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

GJESM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

GJESM Publisher

References

Abreha, K.B.; Enyew, M.; Carlsson, A.S.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Feyissa, T.; Motlhaodi, T.; Geleta, M., (2022). Sorghum in dryland: sorghum's morphological, physiological, and molecular responses under drought stress. Planta. 255: 1-23 (24 Pages).

Akinseye, F.M.; Ajegbe, H.A.; Kamara, A.Y.; Adefisan, E.A.; Whitbread, A.M., (2020). Understanding the response of sorghum cultivars to nitrogen applications in semi-arid Nigeria using the agricultural production systems simulator. J. Plant Nutr., 43(6): 834-850 (17 pages).

Aristya, V.E.; Samijan, S., (2022). The yield gap of maize under intensive cropping system in Central Java. Planta Tropika. J. Agron. Sci., 10(1): 1-12 (12 pages).

Assan, N., (2023). Socio-cultural, economic, and environmental implications for innovation in sustainable food in Africa. Front. Sustainable Food Syst., 7: 1192422 (18 pages).

Babicka, M.; Woźniak, M.; Bartkowiak, M.; Peplińska, B.; Waliszewska, H.; Zborowska, M.; Borysiak, S.; Ratajczak, I., (2022). Miscabanthus and sorghum as sustainable biomass sources for nanocellulose production. Ind. Crops Prod., 186: 115177 (186 pages).

Behera, P.P.; Saharia, N.; Borah, N.; Devi, S.H.; Sarma, R.N., (2022). Sorghum physiology and adaptation to abiotic stresses. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change. 1005-1022 (18 Pages).

Borg, I.; Patrick, J.F.; Groenen; Mair, P., (2018). Applied multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Springer Brief in Statistics (122 pages).

BPS-Statistics Indonesia, (2021). Analysis of maize and soybean productivity in Indonesia. (134 pages).

Cardoso, W.S.; Tardin, F.D.; Tavares, G.P.; Queiroz, P.V.; Mota, S.S.; Kasuya, M.C.M.; Queiroz, J.H., (2013). Use of sorghum straw (Sorghum bicolor) for second generation ethanol production: pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Quim. Nova., 36(5): 623-627 (5 pages).

Chadalavada, K.; Kumari, B.D.R.; Umar, T.S., (2021). Sorghum mitigates climate variability and changes in crop yield and quality. Planta. 253: 113 (19 Pages).

Darmawan, D.P.; Arisena, G.M.K.; Djelantik, A.A.A.W.S.; Krisnandika, A.A.K.; Dewi, N.L.M.I.M.; Korri, N.T.L.; Sukendar, N.M.C., (2023). Farmers’ motivation and obstacles in the smallest available agricultural region. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 9(4): 967-982 (16 pages).

Dorcas, K.; Koech, O.K; Kinama, J.M.; Chemining’wa, G.N.; Ojulong, H.F., (2019). Sorghum production practices in an integrated crop-livestock production system in Makueni County, Eastern Kenya. Trop. Subtropical Agroesyst., 22: 13-23 (11 pages).

Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N.; Brauman, K.A.; Cassidy, E.S.; Gerber, J.S.; Johnston, M.; Mueller, N.D.; O’Connell, C.; Ray, D.K.; West, P.C.; Balzer, C.; Bennett, E.M.; Carpenter, S.R.; Hill, J.; Monfreda, C.; Polasky, S.; Rockström, J.; Sheehan, J.; Siebert, S.; Tilman, D.; Zaks, D.P.M., (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 478(7369): 337-342 (6 pages).

Ganyo, K.K.; Muller, B.; Ndiaye, M.; Gaglo, E.K.; Guissé, A.; Adam, M., (2019). defining fertilization strategies for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) production under sudano-sahelian conditions: Options for late basal fertilizer application. Agronomy. 9(11): 1-18 (18 pages).

Ghalkhani, A.; Golzardi, F.; Khazaei, A.; Mahrokh, A.; Illés, Á.; Bojtor, C.; Mousavi, S.M.N.; Széles, A., (2023). Irrigation management strategies to enhance forage yield, feed value, and water-use efficiency of Sorghum Cultivars. Plants. 12(11): 1-18 (18 pages).

Glab, L.; Sowinski, J., (2019). Sustainable production of sweet sorghum as a bioenergy crop using biosolids taking into account greenhouse gas emissions.. Sustainability. 11: 3033 (17 pages).

Hao, H.; Li, Z.; Leng, C.; Lu C.; Luo H.; Liu Y.; Wu X.; Liu Z.; Shang L.; Jing H.C., (2021). Sorghum breeding in the genomic era: opportunities and challenges. Theor. Appl. Genet., 134: 1899–1924 (36 pages).

Harmini; Fanindi, A.; Sutedi, E.; Herdiawan, I.; Sajimin, (2022). Nutritional content, performance, and ratooning ability of four sorghum genotypes. The 2nd Intern. Conference Environ. Sustainable Anim. Ind., 2nd ICESAI 2021 (5 pages).

Hatfield, J.L.; Boote, K.J.; Kimball, B.A.; Ziska, L.H.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Ort, D.; Thomson, A.M.; Wolfe, D., (2011). Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron. J., 103(2): 351-370 (20 pages).

Hossain, S.; Islam, N.; Rahman, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Khan, A.R., (2022). Sorghum: a prospective crop for climatic vulnerability, food, and nutritional security. J. Agric. Food Res., 8: 100300: 1-9 (9 pages).

Huang, Y.; Sharma, H. C.; Dhillon, M. K., (2013). Bridging conventional and molecular genetics of sorghum insect resistance. Plant Genet. Genom.: Crops Models. 11: 367-389 (23 Pages).

Jabbari, H.; Tabatabaei, S.N.; Kordnejad, E.; Modarresi, M.; Tabeidian, S.A., (2011). Effect of dietary corn silage replacement with sorghum silage on performance and feed cost of growing steers. Online J. Animal Feed Res., 1(1): 14-21 (8 pages).

Jamil, S.; Shahzad, R.; Ahmad, S.; Ali, Z.; Shaheen, S.; Shahzadee, H.; Fatima, N.; Sharif, I.; Aleem, M.; Sultana, R.; Fatima, R.; Rahman, S.U.; Iqbal, M.Z., (2021). Climate change and role of genetics and genomics in climate-resilient sorghum. Dev. Clim. Res. Crops. 111-138 (28 pages).

Jug, I.; Brozović, B.; Dević, B.D.; Wilczewski, E.; Vukadinović, V.; Stipešević, B.; Jug, D., (2021). Response of crops to conservation tillage and nitrogen fertilization under different agroecological conditions. Agronomy. 11(2156): 1-18 (18 pages).

Karandish, F.; Nouri, H.; Brugnach, M. (2021) Agro-economic and socio-environmental assessments of food and virtual water trades of Iran. Sci. Rep., 11: 15022 (16 pages).

Karimuna, S.R.; Wahab, A.; Warda; Baharudin., (2020). The effectiveness of fertilizing to increase growth and productivity of sorghum on dry land and marginal in Southeast Sulawesi. IOP Conference. Environ. Sci., 484: 012073 (9 pages).

Korima, I.; Mansyur; Setiyatwan, H., (2022). Prospects of development of sorghum as ruminant forage feed in Indonesia. J. Trop. Anim. Nutri. Feed Sci., 4(3):109-112 (4 pages).

Lakitan, B., (2014). Inclusive and sustainable management of suboptimal lands for productive agriculture in Indonesia. J. Lahan Suboptimal. 3(2): 181–192 (12 Page).

Lloyd, C.; Ananthan, P.S.; Ramasubramanian, V.; Sugunan, V.V.; Panikkar, P.; Landge, A.T., (2022). Rapid reservoir fisheries appraisal (r-RAPFISH): Indicator-based framework for sustainable fish production in Indian reservoirs. J. Clean. Prod., 379: 134435. (17 pages).

Muazam, A.; Daryono, B. S.; Kristamtini., 2023. Production competitiveness of regional sorghum genotypes against new, enhanced varieties and their morphological traits in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Biodivers. 24(9): 4943-4948 (6 pages).

Pan, L.; An, Dong., (2020). Nitrogen utilization is lower for sorghum-based diets compared with corn-based diets in pigs. Livest. Sci., 237: 104066 (6 pages).

Pontieri, P.; Giudice, L.D., (2016). Sorghum: a novel and healthy food. In: caballero (eds) encyclopedia of food and health. Acad. Press. 33-42 (10 pages).

Prakasham, R.S.; Nagaiah, D.; Vinutha, K.S.; Uma, A.; Chiranjeevi, T.; Umakanth, A.V.; Rao, P.S.; Yan N., (2015). Sorghum biomass: a novel renewable carbon source for industrial bioproducts. Biofuels., 5(2): 159-174 (16 pages).

Rachman, B.; Ariningsih, E.; Sudaryanto, T.; Ariani, M.; Septanti, K.S.; Adawiyah, C.R.; Ashari; Agustian, A.; Saliem, H.P.; Tarigan, H.; Syahyuti; Yuniarti, E., (2022). Sustainability status, sensitive and key factors for increasing rice production: A case study in West Java, Indonesia. Plos One. 17(12): 1-19 (19 pages).

Rao, S.P.; Reddy, B.V.S.; Nagaraj, N.; Upadhyaya, H.D., (2014). Sorghum production for diversified uses. in: genetics, genomics, and breeding of sorghum. series on genetics, genomics, and breeding of crop plants. CRC Press (Taylor and France), Boca Raton, 01-27. ISBN 9781482210088 (28 pages).

Sanni, A.; Adegboyega, O.; Yahya, S. (2022). Sustainability study of sugarcane and sweet sorghum as feedstocks for biotehanol production. Sci. Open. Preprints. 2022 (30 Pages).

Safian, N.; Naderi, M.R.; Torabi, M.; Soleymani, A.; Salemi, H.R., (2022). Corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) yield and nutritional quality affected by drought stress. Biocat. and Agric. Biotechnol., 45(102486): 1-8 (8 pages).

Samimi, M.; Mohammadzadeh, E.; Mohammadzadeh, A., (2023). Rate enhancement of plant growth using Ormus solution: optimization of operating factors by response surface methodology. Int. J. Phytoremediation, 25(12), 1636-1642 (7 pages).

Samimi, M.; Moghadam, H., (2024). Investigation of structural parameters for inclined weir-type solar stills, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 190: 113969 (10 pages).

Samijan, S.; Minarsih, S.; Jauhari, S.; Basuki, S.; Susila, A.; Nurwahyuni, E.; Hindarwati, Y.; Supriyo, A.; Aristya, V.E., (2023). Revitalizing sub-optimal drylands: Exploring the role of biofertilizers. Open Agric., 8(1): 20220214 (11 pages).

Sekaran, U.; Lai, L.; Ussiri, D.A.N.; Kumar, S.; Clay, S., (2021). Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – A review. J. Agric. Food Res., 5: 100190: 1-10 (10 pages).

Septiadi, D.; Hidayati, A.; Danasari, I.F.; Mundiyah, A.I., (2023). The Impact of socio-economic environment of maize farmers in supporting sustainable agriculture in the Mandalika special economic zone. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 1253 012090 (8 pages).

Shenkut, A.; Tesfaye, K.; Abegaz, F., (2013). Determination of water requirement and crop coefficient for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) at Melkassa, Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J., 2(3): 16-24 (9 pages).

Sihono; Soeranto, H.; Wijaya, M.I.; Marina, Y.M.; Puspitasari, W.; Wahyono, T., (2019). Exploring the potential of sorghum for food, animal feed, and bioenergy through induced mutation breeding. Conference: International Conference on Nuclear Capacity Building, Education, Research and Applications (I-Concern’19). Yogyakarta, Indonesia (I-Concern’19) (7 pages).

Singh, S.; Bhat, B.V.; Shukla, G.P.; Singh, K.K.; Gehrana, D., (2018). Variation in carbohydrate and protein fractions, energy, digestibility, and mineral concentrations in stover of sorghum cultivars. Tropic. Grassland For. Trop., 6(1): 42–52 (11 pages).

Sriagtula, R.; Kartib, P.D.M.H.; Abdullah L.; Supriyanto; Astuti, D.A., (2017). Nutrient changes and in vitro digestibility in the generative stage of M10-BMR sorghum mutant lines. Media Peternakan: J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 40(2): 111-117 (7 pages).

Sulewski, P.; Kłoczko-Gajewska, A.; Sroka, W., (2018) Relations between agri-environmental, economic and social dimensions of farms’ sustainability. Sustainability. 10: 4629 (23 pages).

Thawaro, N.; Toomsan, B.; Kaewpradit, W., (2017). Sweet sorghum and upland rice: alternative preceding crops to ameliorate ethanol production and soil sustainability within the sugarcane cropping system. Sugar Technol., 19(1): 64–71 (8 pages).

Tugga, S.E.; Hassan, A.A.; Ojeleye, O.A., (2023). Profitability analysis of sorghum small-scale farmers in selected local government areas of Gombe State, Nigeria. J. Agripreneurship Sustainable Dev., 6(1): 1-9 (9 pages).

USDA, (2022). Grain: world markets and trade. Washington, Disponívelem. United States Department of Agriculture (46 pages).

Widodo, S.; Triastono, J.; Sahara, D.; Pustika, A.B.; Kristamtini; Purwaningsih, H.; Arianti, F.D.; Praptana, R.H.; Romdon, A.S.; Widyayanti, S.S.; Fadwiwati, A.Y.; Muslimin, (2023). Economic value, farmers' perception, and strategic development of sorghum in Central Java and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Agriculture. 13(516): 1 – 22 (22 pages).

Yan, P.; Song, Y.H.; Zhang, K.Y.; Zhang, F.; Tang, Y.J.; Zhao, X.N.; Wang, N.; Ke, F.L.; Gao, F.J.; Li, J.H.; Li, J.X.; Gao, Y., Yang, W.; Gao, F.C.; Qi, D.D.; Wang, Z.; You, G.X.; Han, F.X.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Li, G.Y., (2023). Interaction of genotype-ecological type-plant spacing configuration in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in China. Front. Plant. Sci., 13:1-17 (17 pages).

Zomer, R.J.; Coe, R.; Trabucco, A.; Place, F., (2014). Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. ICRAF Work. Paper No. 179. World Agroforestry Centre (72 pages).

Zhuang, Z.; Shu, W.; Li, Z.; Liao, B.; Li, J.; Shao, J., (2009). Removal of metals by sorghum plants from contaminated land. J Environ Scie (China), 21(10):1432-1437 (6 Pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.