Response of high-yielding soybean varieties to water-saturated and drought stress

., Purwantoro; Purwaningrahayu, R.D.; Kuntyastuti, H.; Harsono, A.; Nuryati, N.; Sulistyo, A.; Yursak, Z.; Soehendi, R.; ., Trustinah; Kuswantoro, H.; Mejaya, M.J.; Harnowo, D.

doi:10.22034/gjesm****04.18

Articles in Press

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

Research Center for Food Crops, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor 16911, West Java, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm****04.18

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The cultivation of soybeans in Indonesia frequently encounters challenges related to water saturation and drought, which ultimately leads to reduced productivity. The objective of this study was to determine how various soybean varieties react to waterlogging and drought in order to identify soybean cultivars that exhibit tolerance to both types of stressors.
METHODS: The study was conducted at the greenhouse of the Indonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute, spanning from June to August 2022. A factorial randomized block design was employed, utilizing pots as the experimental units, with three replicates. The first factor is the availability of groundwater, namely optimal water available (field capacity), 40 percent of field capacity (drought stress), and water-saturated soil (waterlogging stress). The soybean variety is the second factor to consider, which includes Dering 1 (known for its drought tolerance), Dering 2 (also drought tolerant), Deja 1 (tolerant to water saturation), Deja 2 (also tolerant to water saturation), Devon 1 (noted for its high isoflavone content), and Dega 1 (specifically adapted for irrigated lowland conditions).
FINDINGS: The results showed that Dering 2 and Deja 2 varieties grown in soil moisture levels at 40 percent field capacity were capable of achieving similar growth outcomes in terms of plant height, shoot/root ratio, number of pods per plant, seed yield, and 100 seed weight compared to those grown in optimal soil moisture conditions. The stress tolerance index of the two varieties in the soil moisture at 40 percent of field capacity reached 1.03 and 0.83, respectively. The yields of Dering 2 and Deja 2 varieties at the optimal soil moisture reached 4.53 gram per plant and 6.28 gram per plant, and in soil moisture of 40 percent field capacity were 4.68 gram per plant and 5.69 gram per plant respectively. In flooded soil, the Dering 2 and Deja 1 varieties can develop the weight of 100 seeds, number of branches, and plant height as same as in optimal soil moisture, with relatively lower yield reduction compared to other varieties, with stress tolerance index values of 0.66 and 0.54.
CONCLUSION: The Dering 2 and Deja 2 cultivars exhibit tolerance to drought stress levels of up to 40 percent of field capacity, whereas the Dering 2 and Deja 1 cultivars demonstrate tolerance to water-saturated soil. A noteworthy finding is the identification of soybean cultivars capable of thriving in both drought and waterlogged environments, exemplified by the Dering 2 variety. Originally bred to combat drought-related challenges, the Dering 2 cultivar has shown promising results in waterlogged soil conditions as well. Similarly, the Deja 2 variety, which was designed and released for water-saturated environments, was found in this study to be tolerant of drought conditions.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

In soil moisture of 40% of field capacity condition, Dering 2 and Deja 2 were able grow better than those grown in the optimal soil moisture;
In flooded soil, the Dering 2 and Deja 1 varieties can grow better than those grown in the optimal soil moisture;
The Dering 2 variety, which was developed and released for water-stressed soils, has been found to perform well in water-saturated soils;
The Deja 2 variety, which was assembled and released for water-saturated environments, was also found to be tolerant of drought conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Plant and soil environment

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

GJESM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

GJESM Publisher

References

Adie, M.M. and Krisnawati, A., (2019). Agronomic character of drought-tolerant soybeans at the reproductive stage. Berita Biol., 18(3): 339–349 (11 pages).

Bao, A.; Chen, H.; Chen, L.; Chen, S.; Hao, Q.; Guo, W.; Qiu, D.; Shan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Kong, F.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Tran, L.S.P.; Cao, D., (2019). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean. BMC Plant Biol., 19: 1–12 (12 pages).

CBS, (2020). Indonesian Statistics (in Indonesia). Jakarta: Central Bureau of Statistics.

Chen, L.; Yang, H.; Fang, Y.; Guo, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Dai, W.; Chen, S.; Hao, Q.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, D.; Liu, X.; Tran, L.S.P.; Zhou, X.; Cao, D., (2020). Overexpression of GmMYB14 improves high-density yield and drought tolerance of soybean through regulating plant architecture mediated by the brassinosteroid pathway. Plant Biotechnol. J., 19(4): 702–716 (15 pages).

Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, L.; Yao, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Xie, F., (2020). Effect of drought stress during soybean R2–R6 growth stages on sucrose metabolism in leaf and seed. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21(2): 618 (19 pages).

Fletcher, E.; Patterson, R.; Dunne, J.; Saski, C.; Fallen, B., (2023). Evaluating the effects of flooding stress during multiple growth stages in soybean. Agron., 13(5): 1–11 (11 pages).

Gebre, M.G.; Rajcan, I.; Earl, H.J., (2022). Genetic variation for effects of drought stress on yield formation traits among commercial soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars adapted to Ontario, Canada. Front. Plant Sci., 13: 1020944 (15 pages).

Ginting, E.; Harsono, A.; Elisabeth, D.A.; Rahmianna, A.A.; Utomo, J.S.; Harnowo, D., (2022). Yield, seed quality, and financial feasibility of soybean intercropped with maize in the alfisol dry land. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 21(1):323–350 (28 pages).

Hapsari, R.T.; Adie, M.M.; Krisnawati, A., (2021). Yield performance and agronomic character association in soybean genotypes. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 911: 012023 (8 pages).

Harsono, A.; Harnowo, D.; Ginting, E.; Elisabeth, D.A.A., (2022). Soybean in Indonesia: Current status, challenges and opportunities to achieve self-sufficiency. Legumes Research – Vol. 1, IntechOpen (19 pages).

Haryati, Y.; Hamdani, K.K., (2023). Effect of varieties and applications of clove oil on growth, productivity, and pest and disease resilience of soybean. J. Agronomi Indonesia (Indones. J. Agron.), 51(3): 424–432 (9 pages).

Kantolic, A.G.; Slafer, G.A., (2005). Reproductive development and yield components in indeterminate soybean as affected by post-flowering photoperiod. Field Crops Res., 93: 212–222 (11 pages).

Khaleghi, A.; Naderi, R.; Brunetti, C.; Maserti, B.E.; Salami, S.A.; Babalar, M., (2019). Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Sci. Rep., 9: 19250 (12 pages).

Kreuzwieser, J.; Rennenberg, H., (2014). Molecular and physiological responses of trees to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Environ., 37: 2245–2259 (15 pages).

Krisnawati, A.; Nuryati; Adie, M.M., (2021). Agronomic tolerance changes of soybean genotypes under waterlogged condition. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 648: 012046 (8 pages).

Ku, Y.; Au-Yeung, W.; Yung, Y.; Li, M.; Wen, C.; Liu, X.; Lam, H., (2013). Drought stress and tolerance in soybean. IntechOpen. Chapter 10.

Lamba, K.; Kumar, M.; Singh, V.; Chaudhary, L.; Sharm, R.; Yashveer, S.; Dalal, M.S., (2023). Heat stress tolerance indices for identification of the heat tolerant wheat genotypes. Sci. Rep., 13(1): 10842 (13 pages).

Maekawa, T.; Kokubun, M., (2005). Correlation of leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll and rubisco contents with photosynthesis in a supernodulating soybean genotype Sakukei 4. Plant Prod. Sci., 8(4): 419–426 (8 pages).

Nguyen, V.L.; Vu, T.B.; Dinh, T.H.; Mochizuki, T.; Nguyen, V.L., (2015). Genotypic variation in morphological and physiological response of soybean to waterlogging at flowering stage. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res., 4(8): 150–157 (8 pages).

Nurcahyani, E.; Sumardi, H.I.; Qudus, A.; Palupi, A.; Sholekhah, (2019). Analysis of chlorophyll Phalaenopsi samabilis (L.) Bl result of the resistance to Fusarium oxysporum and drought stress. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 12(11): 41–46 (6pages).

Nur’aini; Rachmawati, D., (2022). Physiological response and growth of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 'Dega 1' in different water availability. Biogenesis. 10(1): 89–97 (9 pages).

Pandey, S.K.; Stuti, M.; Shrivastava, M.K.; Archana, R.; Shrivastava, A.N.; Tsuji, K.; Kobayashi, S., (2022). Evaluation of soybean cultivars and lines under excessive moisture stress in Eastern Madhya Pradesh. J. Biotech. Crop Sci., 10(15): 89–101 (13 pages).

Parolin, P., (2001). Seed germination and early establishment of 12 tree species from nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor Central Amazonian floodplains. Aquat. Bot., 70(2): 89–103 (15 pages).

Pratiwi, Y.; Kastono, D.; Indradewi, D. (2019). Root comparison of five soybean cultivars (Glycine max L.) in drought condition with different measurement methods. Vegetalika. 8(4): 276–291 (16 pages).

Reyna, N.; Cornelious, B.; Shannon, J.G.; Sneller, C.H., (2003). Evaluation of a QTL for waterlogging tolerance in southern soybean germplasm. Crop Sci., 43: 2077–2082 (6 pages).

Riduan, A.; Rainiyati, R.; Alia, Y.; Nusifera, S., (2022). Tolerance some soybean cultivars to stress drought at vegetative to generative phase. J. Penelitian Pendidikan IPA., 8(1): 1–11 (11 pages).

Samudin, S.; Kuswantoro, H., (2018). Effect of Rhizobium inoculation to nodulation and growth of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] germplasm. Legume Res., 41(2): 303–310 (8 pages).

Sinclair, T.R.; Zimet, A.R.; Muchow, R.C., (1988). Changes in soybean nodule number and dry weight in response to drought. Field Crops Res., 18(2-3): 197–202 (6 pages).

Smolenaars, W.J.; Paparrizos, S.; Werners, S.; Ludwig, F., (2021). Flood risk and adaptation strategies for soybean production systems on the flood-prone pampas under climate change. Agron., 11: 1–21 (21 pages).

Soehendi, R.; Mejaya, M.J.; Suhartina; Trustinah; Purwantoro; Nuryati; Sulistyo, A., (2024). Breeding of tolerant soybean varieties for saturated wáter. AIP Conference Proceeding. 2957: 080009 (7 pages).

Sulistyo, A.; Purwantoro; Mejaya, M.J.; Nugrahaeni, N.; Suhartina, (2021). Determination of genetic parameters of seed characteristics in edible soybean. Legume Res., 44(5): 522–526 (5 pages).

Sulistyo, A.; Suhartina; Nugrahaeni, N.; Purwantoro, (2017). Selection of soybean lines (Glycine max) tolerant to drought. In: ICoSI 2014: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Innovation. Springer. 83–92 (10 pages).

Sullivan, M.; Vantoai, T.; Fausey, N.; Beuerlein, J.; Parkinson, R.; Soboyejo, A., (2001). Evaluating on-farm flooding impacts on soybean. Crop Sci., 41(1): 93–100 (8 pages).

Toai, T.T.V.; Hoa, T.T.C.; Hue, N.T.N.; Nguyen, H.T.; Shannon, J.G.; Rahman, M.A., (2010). Flooding tolerance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm from Southeast Asia under field and screen-house environments. Open Agric. J., 4(1): 38–46 (9 pages).

Vogel, J.T.; Liu, W.; Olhoft, P.; Crafts-Brandner, S.J.; Pennycooke, J.C.; Christiansen, N., (2021). Soybean yield formation physiology– A foundation for precision breeding based improvement. Front. Plant Sci., 12: 1–15 (15 pages).

Wahyuningsih, S.; Sundari, T.; Sutrisno; Harnowo, D.; Harsono, A.; Soehendi, R.; Mejaya, M.J., (2021). Growth and productivity of soybean (Glycine max (l.) merr.) genotypes under shading. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 19(5): 3377–3392 (16 pages).

Wang, X.; Komatsu, S., (2018). Proteomic approaches to uncover the flooding and drought stress response mechanisms in soybean. J. Proteom., 172: 201–215 (15 pages).

Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Hui, W.; Zhao, F.; Wang, P.; Su, C.; Gong, W., (2022). Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: A Review. Forests., 13(2): 324 (16 pages).

Xiong, R.; Liu, S.; Considine, M.J.; Siddique, K.H.; Lam, H.M.; Chen, Y., (2021). Root system architecture, physiological and transcriptional traits of soybean (Glycine max L.) in response to water deficit: A review. Physiol. Plant., 172(2): 405–418 (14 pages).

Xu, C.; Li, R.; Song, W.; Wu, T.; Sun, S.; Hu, S.; Han, T.; Wu, C., (2021). Responses of branch number and yield component of soybean cultivars tested in different planting densities. Agric., 11(1): 69 (12 pages).

Yamane, K.; Iijima, M., (2016). Nodulation control of crack fertilization technique reduced the growth inhibition of soybean caused by short-term waterlogging at early vegetative stage. Plant Prod. Sci., 19(3): 438–448 (11 pages).

Ye, H.; Song, L.; Chen, H.; Valliyodan, B.; Cheng, P.; Ali, L.; Vuong, T.; Wu, C.; Orlowski, J.; Buckley, B.; Chen, P.; Shannon, J.G.; Nguyen, H.T., (2018). A major natural genetic variation associated with root system architecture and plasticity improves waterlogging tolerance and yield in soybean. Plant Cell Environ., 41(9): 2169–2182 (14 pages).

Zhuang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Yao, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liang, C.; Liao, H.; Tian, J., (2021). Phosphate starvation responsive GmSPX5 mediates nodule growth through interaction with GmNF-YC4 in soybean (Glycine max). Plant J., 108 (5): 1422–1438 (17 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management

Response of high-yielding soybean varieties to water-saturated and drought stress

References

References

Letters to Editor

Send comment about this article

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 08 May 2024

Response of high-yielding soybean varieties to water-saturated and drought stress

References

References

Letters to Editor

Send comment about this article

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript Available Online from 08 May 2024

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 08 May 2024